If I hate something - I cannot express it on social network. If something bothers me - I cannot say it. When I know something is wrong - I have two choices - write it down in my journal - which I do more often when I come across the fact I have been blocked out. I am angry - I will use my journal - no one can stop me from doing that. No moderator, no administrator.
No one. Its just me and my thoughts. My emotions and my feelings, written down using ink. No I will not use the computer to do that, who knows what kind technology there which can be transmitted from a mere word processor.
Only those moderate are those who are afraid what I say is right. The answer are placard, leaflets and what I write my private journal.What kind of world is it - in which there is such thing thought control? One should restrain ones emotions and thoughts.
One should not express something, which presumably will hurt the feelings of others. The truth hurts a great deal - because it happens to be true. What a strange world we live in, in which people do not want censorship yet at the same time they want thought control.
It seems that only a handful of people - the so called opinion leaders determined what people should think and how they should act. Those opinion leaders have infiltrated everything, they also determine what should be reported. The concept of embedded reporters, embedded with the armed forces - so that they should never report anything which should not report anything which will undermine the security of the soldiers. In the Vietnam war - the media exposed the My Lai incident in Vietnam.
Now only those things could be reported in which are cleared by the generals in command - the freedom of the press went to the dogs/ The Internet was the boon of the information age. Soldiers initially started posting personal information about what they had or were experiencing in combat. That was carefully and cleverly sabotaged. Soldiers who sent any email or chatted on friends on-line was punished. News and information about the wars was stopped. Chat websites which allowed a free exchange of news and opinions were torn down. No one knows how many My Lai type incidents have occurred - but this time never reported.
New websites emerged which were carefully monitored, because had not done fighting wars. It needed opinions which favoured.
But then Wikileaks emerged - destroying all the defences which had been carefully placed to prevent people from accessing those things which had been banned. The USA is democratic country and supposedly free country - yet people there only know what they are told. There is no real news thus the 'Mainstream Media' is hated when the truth is found out from some other source. So if I post something which is not approved by the 'Opinion Leaders' it is inevitable I would be blocked out. Because I may made a hate comment. Yes hate it when people are being killed. I hate it when atrocities are committed and they are considered the work of heroes.
No one. Its just me and my thoughts. My emotions and my feelings, written down using ink. No I will not use the computer to do that, who knows what kind technology there which can be transmitted from a mere word processor.
Only those moderate are those who are afraid what I say is right. The answer are placard, leaflets and what I write my private journal.What kind of world is it - in which there is such thing thought control? One should restrain ones emotions and thoughts.
One should not express something, which presumably will hurt the feelings of others. The truth hurts a great deal - because it happens to be true. What a strange world we live in, in which people do not want censorship yet at the same time they want thought control.
It seems that only a handful of people - the so called opinion leaders determined what people should think and how they should act. Those opinion leaders have infiltrated everything, they also determine what should be reported. The concept of embedded reporters, embedded with the armed forces - so that they should never report anything which should not report anything which will undermine the security of the soldiers. In the Vietnam war - the media exposed the My Lai incident in Vietnam.
Now only those things could be reported in which are cleared by the generals in command - the freedom of the press went to the dogs/ The Internet was the boon of the information age. Soldiers initially started posting personal information about what they had or were experiencing in combat. That was carefully and cleverly sabotaged. Soldiers who sent any email or chatted on friends on-line was punished. News and information about the wars was stopped. Chat websites which allowed a free exchange of news and opinions were torn down. No one knows how many My Lai type incidents have occurred - but this time never reported.
New websites emerged which were carefully monitored, because had not done fighting wars. It needed opinions which favoured.
But then Wikileaks emerged - destroying all the defences which had been carefully placed to prevent people from accessing those things which had been banned. The USA is democratic country and supposedly free country - yet people there only know what they are told. There is no real news thus the 'Mainstream Media' is hated when the truth is found out from some other source. So if I post something which is not approved by the 'Opinion Leaders' it is inevitable I would be blocked out. Because I may made a hate comment. Yes hate it when people are being killed. I hate it when atrocities are committed and they are considered the work of heroes.
Comments